Head to head · Web Hosting

Bluehost vs Hostinger

Two budget friendly shared hosts with different strengths. Hostinger wins on value, speed and a modern panel; Bluehost wins on phone support and WordPress brand familiarity. Here is how they compare, and which one fits your site.

Reviewed by M. HALLORAN·Updated APRIL 2026·How we vet
★ Our pick
Hostinger
90 /100
vs
Challenger
Bluehost
82 /100
◂ Hostinger Advantage Bluehost ▸
A solid edge to Hostinger on value and speed · Bluehost answers the phone.

These are affiliate links marked rel=“sponsored”. We may earn a commission if you buy · it never affects our scores or who wins. Disclosure.

How they score

Criteria Hostinger Bluehost Winner
Ease of use
88
84
Hostinger
Performance and speed
87
80
Hostinger
Support
81
84
Bluehost
Value for money
92
83
Hostinger
WordPress features
85
81
Hostinger
Uptime and reliability
86
84
Hostinger

Scores are our editorial assessment against the VettedSaaS rubric · not vendor supplied.

Choose Hostinger if…
+You want the most site for the lowest price
+You value a fast, modern control panel
+You are happy with chat support over phone
+You want a free CDN and quick WordPress setup
Choose Bluehost if…
+You want phone support from a familiar brand
+You are a first time WordPress user
+You prefer a guided onboarding
+You want a US based host with a long track record

Feature by feature

✓ full  ·  ∼ partial  ·  — none
Capability Hostinger Bluehost
Managed WordPress
Free CDN Cloudflare
AI website builder basic
Phone support
Free email hosting
Free domain first year
Money back guarantee 30 days 30 days

Feature support verified as of June 2026 · check the vendor for current details.

Pricing, side by side

Intro rate per month · renewals differ
Hostinger Our pick
Premium $2.99
Business $3.99
Cloud Startup $7.99
Bluehost Challenger
Basic $2.95
Choice Plus $5.45
Online Store $9.95

Pricing as of June 2026 · intro rates on multi year terms. Hostinger renews from about $10.99/mo and Bluehost from $10.99/mo. Check the vendor for current pricing.